How Bitcoindu researches, writes and corrects content
These standards keep the site useful, transparent and separate from financial promotion.
Accuracy matters more than publishing volume.
Pages are expected to serve a distinct reader need. When a topic cannot be explained responsibly or supported by dependable sources, it should not be presented as settled fact.
Source hierarchy
Protocol documentation, public blockchain explorers, official project documentation and regulatory sources are preferred. Secondary sources may add context but should not replace primary evidence when it is available.
Accuracy and context
Articles distinguish facts, estimates and interpretation. Price examples are educational snapshots, not executable quotes or predictions.
Risk-first language
Content about custody, wallets, exchanges, scams and transactions must explain irreversible actions, common failure points and practical precautions.
Reviews and corrections
Material changes should update the visible review date and the sitemap. Confirmed errors are corrected directly rather than hidden behind vague wording.
Commercial separation
Donations, advertising and future affiliate relationships must be disclosed. Commercial support does not determine conclusions or remove relevant risks.
Use of automated tools
Automated tools may assist with research organization, formatting or drafting. Published claims still require human review for clarity, accuracy, sourcing and originality.
Found an error or outdated statement?
Send the page URL, the exact passage and a reliable supporting source.